Aerial system utilizing a tethered uni-rotor network of satellite vehicles.

ABSTRACT

A tethered uni-rotor network of satellite vehicles, is a novel aerial system which combines the best features of both fixed-wing and rotorcraft design methodologies, while minimizing their respective deficiencies. It is made up of a central hub with multiple tethers, where each tether arm radiates outward and attaches to a satellite vehicle; each having lifting airfoil surfaces, stabilizers, control surfaces, fuselages, and propulsion systems. The entire system operates in a state of rotation, which is driven by the propulsion units on each satellite. As the system rotates, centrifugal forces pull the satellite vehicles outward, which maintain tension on the tether arms. As the satellite vehicles move through space, the airfoils generate lift which supports each each satellite and a distributed portion of the weight of the central hub.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/430,475, thecontents of which are incorporated by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was not federally sponsored.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the invention: This invention relates to the general field ofaerial systems, and more specifically toward an aerial system utilizinga tethered uni-rotor network of satellite vehicles; which is, inparticular embodiments, an aerial system with a novel design, whichcombines the best features of both helicopter and fixed-wing aircraftwhile minimizing each of their deficiencies.

Fixed-wing aircraft, particularly gliders, are very efficient vehicleswhich attempt to minimize the amount of drag acting on the system. Oneof the primary means available to engineers to achieve this is toincrease the aspect ratio of the wing, which is the ratio between thewingspan and the chord length. A high aspect ratio wing is desirablefrom an aerodynamic drag perspective; however, there are limitationswith this approach. As the wing becomes more slender, with a higheraspect ratio, it becomes much more flexible and can experience bend andtwist during flight. Furthermore, longer wings are prone to greaterbending moments at the root, which is the attachment point between thefuselage and wing. Counteracting this increased moment requiresadditional structural material to reinforce this connection point.Finally, fixed-wing aircraft need a forward velocity to facilitateairflow over the airfoil to produce lift. Thus, these systems cannothover or takeoff vertically.

Unlike fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters have desirable vertical takeoffand landing (VTOL) and hovering capabilities. Consider a helicopter atrest on a tarmac. The rotor blades are generally so thin, that they bendand deflect under their own weight. However, these flimsy structures arecapable of lifting a heavy vehicle once they are spinning, because theybenefit from centrifugal forces which provide stiffening throughout therotor element. The downside for such a rotor design, is it is notaerodynamically efficient. The rotors suffer from triangular spanloading, meaning the outboard sections are primarily responsible forproducing lift, while the inboard sections are quite ineffectual.

Thus, there has existed a long-felt need for an improved aerial system.One that is stable and controllable in flight, with desirable verticaltakeoff and landing capabilities. One that reduces aerodynamic drag, byimplementing a more efficient elliptical span loading across its liftingsurfaces, but simultaneously mitigates bending moments common to slenderwing profiles. One that carries a payload, and implements both hover andtranslational movement.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The current invention provides just such a solution with an aerialsystem utilizing a tethered uni-rotor network of satellite vehicles. Theconcept is made up of a central hub with multiple tethers, where eachtether arm radiates outward and attaches to a satellite vehicle; eachhaving lifting airfoil surfaces, stabilizers, control surfaces,fuselages, and propulsion systems. The entire system operates in a stateof rotation, which is driven by the propulsion units on each satellite.As the system rotates, centrifugal forces pull the satellite vehiclesoutward, which maintain tension on the tether arms. As the satellitevehicles move through space, the airfoil generates lift which supportseach each satellite vehicle and a distributed portion of the weight ofthe central hub.

A goal of a tethered uni-rotor network system, according to selectedembodiments disclosed herein, is to utilize centrifugal stiffeninginherent within a traditional helicopter configuration, while keepingthe beneficial VTOL/hover capabilities. Furthermore, the traditionalhelicopter rotor will be replaced with tethered satellite vehicles,which eliminate triangular span loading, which allows for a more idealelliptical span loading distribution. Such an aerial system permits muchhigher aspect ratios than traditional fixed-wing glider designs, becausethe centrifugal stiffening mitigates the bending moment common inslender wing designs.

It is an object of the invention to provide an aerial system withimproved aerodynamic efficiency by reducing aerodynamic drag.

It is additionally an object of the invention to provide an aerialsystem with increased structural rigidity through centrifugalstiffening.

It is another object of the invention to provide an aerial system withredundant lift systems.

It is also an object of the invention to provide an aerial system thatoperates at high altitude for an extended period of time.

It is a further object of this invention to provide an aerial systemthat may remain airborne for an indefinite period of time.

As used herein, a “satellite vehicle” shall describe the component thatcontains the fuselages, winged lifting surfaces, stabilizers, controlsurfaces, and propulsion units.

As used herein, a “tether” shall describe the flexible cable whichconnects a satellite vehicle to the central hub, and which maintainstension forces between the two.

As used herein, a “tether arm” shall describe a satellite vehicleconnected to its respective tether.

As used herein, the “central hub” shall describe the centermostcomponent to which all the tether arms are secured.

The most general embodiment of the current disclosure is an aerialsystem comprising a central hub, which connects to multiple tethers,which radiate outward away from the central hub, where at the end ofeach tether is a satellite vehicle. Each satellite vehicle comprisesseveral components, including: fuselages, which house avionicscomponents; winged airfoil sections, which produce lift; propulsionunits, which provide thrust to counteract aerodynamic drag; stabilizersurfaces, which help the satellite vehicle maintain a desiredtrajectory; and control surfaces, which manipulate the trajectory of thesatellite. The tether for each tether arm is a thin filament cable whichtransmits tension forces between the central hub and its respectivesatellite vehicle, but it does not transmit compression forces orbending moments.

The preferred embodiment for the number of tether arms is four. Thisallows for the easiest control methodology and permits redundancy in theevent a tether arm becomes disabled. However, other numbers of tetherarms are permissible. Two tether arms are the minimum number needed tocounter balance the rotation, but this does not completely stabilize thecentral hub, which is free to swing like a hammock. As such two tetherarms should be reserved for times when the other tether arms have becomedisabled, or for applications when the central hub is constrained inother ways, such as within an airborne wind energy device. Three tetherarms is the minimum number needed to completely stabilize the centralhub, and offers the most ideal aerodynamic properties from centrifugalstiffening, because it has the most concentrated mass in each tetherarm. However, an odd number of tether arms is more difficult to control,because pairs of tether arms are not directly opposing one another, andit does not offer any redundancy in the event of a tether arm failure.Any number of tether arms greater than or equal to five is alsoconceivable, and can offer increased redundancy and robustness. However,with each additional arm the amount of beneficial centrifugal stiffeningdecreases and the complexity of the system increases, so using moretether arms represents a standard engineering tradeoff.

The preferred embodiment for the wing surface is a single, flat,horizontal, mono-wing, with an airfoil that produces lift at zero angleof attack. This is expected to be the simplest embodiment which providesthe greatest benefit to the tethered uni-rotor network system. However,alternative configurations are acceptable. A non-lift producing profilemay be beneficial for other applications. Angled or curved liftingsurfaces may be introduced to attain different aerodynamiccharacteristics.

Multiple lifting surfaces in various locations may provide enhancedstabilization or controllability for the entire system.

The preferred embodiment for the type of propulsion unit is a brushlesselectric motor with a fixed pitch propeller. This is the simplestembodiment which reduces mechanical complexity. However, otherembodiments are allowable. Alternative fuel sources may be used to powerthe aircraft, such as heavy fuel, fuel cells, or hybrid systems.Variable pitch propellers could replace or compliment the fixed pitchpropellers, which would offer a faster thrust dynamic response.Alternatively, propeller systems could be omitted, and other mechanismsused in its place, such as rocket or jet propulsion.

The preferred embodiment for the number of propulsion units is two. Thispermits each individual satellite vehicle to possess its own verticaltakeoff and landing (VTOL) capability which greatly simplifies thetakeoff and landing process for the entire tethered uni-rotor networksystem. A single propulsion unit is conceivable, but VTOL for eachsatellite vehicle is not possible, which complicates other aspects ofthe system operation during takeoff and landing. Propulsion unitsgreater than two can also be employed, and may offer advantages despitethe extra hardware complexity. For instance, four propulsion unitsarranged in a rectangle, resembles a standard quadrotor configuration,which may reduce complexity within the controller architecture. Or,placing a multitude of propulsion units on the leading edge of theairfoil has aerodynamic benefits, because forced air over the wing helpsmaintain laminar flow.

The preferred embodiment for the placement of propulsion units,stabilizers, and control surfaces is as follows. Two propulsion unitsare located near each of the wingtips of each satellite vehicle.Fuselages, located directly behind the propulsion units, house theirrespective components. Vertical stabilizers are mounted on the fuselagesand located directly within the prop wash of the propellers, where eachvertical stabilizer has a control surface, which mirrors a rudderfunctionality. The outermost sections of the wing can be consideredhorizontal stabilizers, each having their own control surfaces, whichmirrors an elevon functionality, where an elevon combines the featuresof a traditional elevator and a traditional aileron. This preferredembodiment simplifies the controls development because the controlinputs are orthogonal to one another, which yields strong input-outputmappings. However, alternative embodiments exist which may be preferableunder certain circumstances. The previously mentioned quadrotorpropulsion configuration could do away with control surfaces entirely.Similarly, adding articulation to the orientation of the propulsion unitcould eliminate the need for some control surfaces. Finally, angledstabilizers could offer a slight aerodynamic advantage by eliminating asmall drag surface, but such a “ruddevator” has significantcross-coupling between inputs and outputs, and requires a morecomplicated control strategy.

The preferred embodiment for takeoff and landing operation includes atether retracting mechanism, which can reel each of the tether arms inand out, to reduce the overall footprint of the tethered uni-rotornetwork system. This is the preferred embodiment because it increasesthe number of potential deployment locations and aids with storage whennot in use. The retracting mechanism may be housed in either the centralhub, or each of the wings of the satellite vehicle. Alternativeembodiments may forgo a retracting mechanism, and elect to use standardlanding gear mounted on each of the satellite vehicles.

A further embodiment of the current disclosure is a method of operatingthe tethered uni-rotor network system while in hovering flight. Wherethe aerial system is comprised of a central hub, where multiple tetherarms radiate outward, where each tether arm is comprised of a tetherelement and a satellite vehicle, where each satellite vehicle iscomprised of fuselages, wing sections, propulsion units, stabilizers,and control surfaces. Where the entire system operates in a state ofrotation, with the propulsion units overcoming aerodynamic drag, withthe airfoils providing lift to overcome gravity, with centrifugal forceskeeping the tether arms taught, and with the tether elementstransmitting tension forces but not compression forces or bendingmoments.

A further embodiment of the current disclosure is a method ofdynamically controlling the tethered uni-rotor network system to achievevertical and horizontal translation for the entire air-craft. Where thehover operation, described in the previous paragraph, is altered in thefollowing ways. Where collectively adjusting throttle, changes theangular rate of the system, which changes the airflow over the wing,which changes the lift generated, which invokes vertical translation.Where collectively adjusting the elevons, changes the pitch of eachsatellite vehicle, which induces a spiral trajectory of the satellitevehicles, which also invokes vertical translation. Where cyclicallyadjusting the rudders, changes the tension in the tethers, such that atone point in the rotation there is a maximum pull from tension, andexactly opposite that point there is a minimum pull from tension, whichcreates a lateral force imbalance, which invokes horizontal translation.Where cyclically adjusting the elevons, changes the elevations of thesatellite vehicle, such that at one point in the rotation each satellitevehicle passes a low point, and exactly opposite that point eachsatellite passes a high point, which alters the plane of rotation of therotor, which tilts the overall thrust vector, which introduces a lateralforce, which also invokes horizontal translation.

A further embodiment of the current disclosure is a method of utilizinga tether retracting mechanism to execute takeoff and landing for atethered uni-rotor network system. Where each tether begins in aretracted state, such that each satellite is in close proximity to thecentral hub. Where each satellite vehicle is initially oriented upwardin a tail-sitter configuration. Where each satellite vehicle hasindependent vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities. Where allsatellite vehicles takeoff in unison, thus supporting the weight of allthe satellite vehicles and the central hub from thrust generated by thepropulsion units. Where each satellite vehicle executes a maneuvermoving away from the central hub, thus extending the tether arms untilthey are fully extended. Where each satellite pitches forward to beginthe rotation of the tethered uni-rotor network system. Where eachsatellite continues to pitch forward through a transformational flightprocess, such that the weight of the system begins to shift from thepropulsion units onto the wing lifting surfaces. Where thetransformational process is completed once all satellite vehicles are intheir forward flight configuration, and the wing lifting surfacescompletely support the weight of the entire system, and the vehicleoperates in a hover flight as previously described, and the system isdynamically controlled as previously described. Where the landingoperation is identical to the takeoff procedure, but in an exactlyopposite sequence. This is the preferred method of takeoff and landingbecause it minimizes the footprint of the aerial system.

An alternative embodiment of the current disclosure is a differentmethod for takeoff and landing for a tethered uni-rotor network system,which forgoes the retracting mechanism previously described. Where thereis no tether retracting mechanism. Where the satellite vehicles areequipped with a set of standard aircraft landing gear. Where the tethersare fully extended and the satellite vehicles are initially at rest awayfrom the central hub. Where all the satellite vehicles increase throttleand begin to taxi while on the ground. Where the tether arms restrictthe linear motion of the satellites vehicles in taxi and force them tocircle around the central hub. Where all satellite vehicles continue toincrease throttle until lift is sufficient to overcome the weight of thesystem, and the vehicle operates in a hover flight as previouslydescribed, and the system is dynamically controlled as previouslydescribed. Where the landing operation is identical to the takeoffprocedure, but in an exactly opposite sequence. This is an acceptablealternative embodiment for takeoff and landing, when a retracting tethermechanism is not employed.

Thus, it has been outlined, rather broadly, the more important featuresof the invention, in order that the detailed description thereof may bebetter understood, and in order that the present contribution to the artmay be better appreciated. While the previous description outlined thepreferred embodiments, and summarized some notable alternativeembodiments, these descriptions are for illustrative purposes only, anddo not limit the scope of the disclosed invention. There are additionalfeatures of the invention that will be described hereinafter and whichwill form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto. The featureslisted herein and other features, aspects and advantages of the presentinvention will become better understood with reference to the followingdescription and appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part ofthis specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention; andtogether with the description, serve to explain the principles of thisinvention.

FIG. 1 includes a perspective (FIG. 1A), a side (FIG. 1B), and a topview (FIG. 1C) of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft according toselected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 2 includes a perspective (FIG. 2A), a front (FIG. 2B), a side (FIG.2C), and a top view (FIG. 2D) of a satellite vehicle according toselected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the interacting forces transmitted by thetether between the satellite vehicle and the central hub according toselected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a side view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft in avertical takeoff configuration according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a side view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft as thesatellite vehicles extend the tether arms outward according to selectedembodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 6 includes diagrams showing the satellite vehicle transition fromvertical takeoff and landing to forward flight (sequentially, FIGS. 6A,6B and 6C) according to selected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 7 is a side view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft with itstethers fully extended according to selected embodiments of the currentdisclosure.

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a satellite vehicle with a gimbal orarticulated propulsion unit according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with four propulsion unitsaccording to selected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with a single propulsionunit according to selected embodiments of the current disclosure.

FIG. 11 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with dual propulsionunits and angled stabilizers according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure.

FIG. 12 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with a plurality ofpropulsion units according to selected embodiments of the currentdisclosure.

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraftwith a satellite vehicle failure according to selected embodiments ofthe current disclosure.

FIG. 14 is a view of a prior art airborne wind energy device.

FIG. 15 is a view of a tethered uni-rotor network system adapted to anairborne wind energy device according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Many aspects of the invention can be better understood with thereferences made to the drawings below. The components in the drawingsare not necessarily drawn to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed uponclearly illustrating the components of the present invention. Moreover,like reference numerals designate corresponding parts through theseveral views in the drawings.

According to selected embodiments, the tethered uni-rotor network ofsatellite vehicles is an aerial system that has a central hub, withmultiple tethers that radiate outwards, which each attach to a satellitevehicle at the outboard position. Each satellite vehicle resembles asmall aircraft system which include: fuselages containing avioniccomponents, airfoil lifting sections, propulsion units, stabilizers, andcontrol surfaces. Embodiments of the aerial system herein, operates in aperpetual state of rotation during flight. The rotation is driven by thepropulsion units on each of the satellite vehicle. As the system spins,centrifugal forces keep the tethers taught. Furthermore, as the systemspins, each satellite vehicle moves through the air, which generateslift on the winged airfoil sections. The amount of lift generated isenough to counteract the weight of the satellite vehicles and adistributed portion of the weight of the central hub.

FIG. 1A is a perspective view, FIG. 1B is a side view, and FIG. 1C is atop view, of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft according to selectedembodiments of the current disclosure.

The tethered uni-rotor network aircraft 10 includes multiple satellitevehicles 40, in this view four satellite vehicles 40, which are eachconnected to the central hub 30 via their own tether 20. The satellitevehicles 40 rotate around the central hub 30.

FIG. 2A is a perspective view, FIG. 2B is a front view, FIG. 2C is aside view, and FIG. 2D is a top view, of a satellite vehicle accordingto selected embodiments of the current disclosure. The satellite vehicle40 has fuselages 46, in this embodiment there are two, which each have apropulsion unit 47, in this embodiment it is a propeller, to generatethrust. A lifting surface 41, such as a wing, provides lift, which is agenerally upward force. Horizontal stabilizers 44 and verticalstabilizers 42 provide overall stability to the satellite vehicle 40.Several control surfaces provide directional control for both yaw andpitch, to the satellite vehicle 40. Vertical control surfaces 43 act asrudders, and horizontal control surfaces 45 act as elevons. As shown inthis figure, the satellite vehicle has a symmetrical “flying wing”design, with two props on either end, and all the control surfaceslocated within the prop wash. As will be appreciated by those skilled inthe art, other positions, locations, orientations, or geometries of thelifting surfaces, stabilizers, control surfaces, or propulsion units,may be used to control the satellite vehicles.

The tethered uni-rotor network systems, disclosed herein, utilize thesame beneficial centrifugal stiffening as a traditional helicopterrotor. However, the inboard rotor sections, which represent wastedmaterial and have detrimental aerodynamic properties, are replaced witha thin tether filament. Because the outboard section is free to pivotabout the tether connection point, there is no detrimental bendingmoment which is typically found at the wing root of fixed-wing gliderdesigns. As such, the centrifugal stiffening within the aerial aircraftallows for much greater aspect ratios than can be attained by atraditional tube-and-wing style aircraft.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the interacting forces transmitted throughthe tether between the satellite vehicle and the central hub accordingto selected embodiments of the current disclosure. As the systemoperates, three components of a force vector act at the connection pointon the central hub. A vertical force arises from the weight of thecentral hub, a lateral force arises from the aerodynamic drag pulling onthe tether, and a radial force arises from the centrifugal forcespresent from the rotation of the system. These three forces are presenteven during the hover operation of the tethered uni-rotor networksystem. However, altering the relative position of a satellite vehiclewith respect to the central hub, will also alter the magnitude of thecomponent forces acting on the central hub anchor point. As thesatellite vehicle 40 moves away from the central hub 30, the satellitevehicle 40 pulls on the tether 20, which in turn increases the magnitudeof the radial force on the central hub 30. Similarly, moving inwarddecreases the magnitude of the vector. As the satellite vehicle 40 movesupward with respect to the central hub 30, the satellite vehicle 40pulls upward on the tether 20, which in turn increases the magnitude ofthe vertical force on the central hub 30. Similarly, moving downwarddecreases the magnitude of the vector. As the satellite vehicle 40 movesforward with respect to the central hub 30, the satellite vehicle 40pulls forward on the tether 20, which in turn increases the magnitude ofthe lateral force on the central hub 30. Similarly, moving backwarddecreases the magnitude of the vector. So long as there is tension inthe tether, these forces are transferred to the hub, subject to drag andother frictional losses.

Relative positions of the satellite vehicles with respect to the centralhub dictate the magnitudes of the forces acting on the central hub. Byusing appropriate coordinated flight maneuvers among each of thesatellite vehicles, the total forces acting on the central hub can bemanipulated such that the entire tethered uni-rotor network systemachieves translation. Two types of translation are considered, verticaland horizontal, which have a parallel in helicopter terminology as“collective” and “cyclic” commands. Each type of translation has twoassociated control modes, each of which are described in greater detailin the following two paragraphs.

Vertical translation uses“collective” commands, where each satellitevehicle adjusts its settings in unison. Adjusting the throttle increasesor decreases the velocity of the satellite vehicle, and thus the angularrate of rotation of the aerial system. This changes the amount ofairflow over the lifting surfaces or wing, which increases or decreasesthe total amount of lift generated. Adjusting the amount of lift causesthe aerial system to ascend or descend. Second, adjusting the pitch ofeach satellite vehicle through the elevon control surfaces, will causeeach satellite vehicle to nose up or down, thus the entire system willclimb or fall as each satellite vehicle moves through a spiraltrajectory.

Horizontal translation is achieved with “cyclic” commands, where thecontrol inputs are changed in a sinusoidal fashion throughout therotation. The first cyclic command is applied to the rudder controlsurface, which manipulates the amount of radial tension on the tether.At one point there is a maximum pull from the tension, and exactlyopposite that point there is a minimum pull from tension. This imbalancecauses the aerial system to translate horizontally. Second, cyclicelevon commands can achieve horizontal translation. At one point asatellite vehicle passes a low elevation, and at the exact oppositepoint the satellite vehicle passes a high elevation. This essentiallyreorients the plane of rotation of the rotor, which tilts the verticalthrust vector from the airfoils, such that now a horizontal component ispresent. This type of thrust vectoring is similar to how traditionalmultirotors translate horizontally.

Having described the hover operation and the overall controlmethodology, now consider the preferred embodiment for the takeoff andlanding procedure. The next four paragraphs describe an approach whichutilizes a retracting tether mechanism to reel in and out the tetherarms, which achieves a smaller footprint for the tethered uni-rotornetwork system during takeoff and landing.

FIG. 4 is a side view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft in avertical takeoff configuration according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure. Each satellite vehicle 40 is oriented upward in atail-sitter configuration. Each of the propulsion units generate adownward thrust, thereby producing an upward force which lifts eachsatellite vehicle. The figure depicts each satellite vehicle asconnected to the central hub 30 via a reeled in tether 20. Otherembodiments of the design may include a locking mechanism which secureseach of the satellite vehicles to the central hub prior to takeoff.

FIG. 5 is a side view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraft as thesatellite vehicles extend the tether arms outward according to selectedembodiments of the current disclosure. As long as the satellite vehicledesign has appropriately placed propulsion units and control surfaces,each satellite vehicle will have its own independent VTOL capability.Once the satellite vehicles attain a suitable altitude, they begin totraverse away from the central hub, thereby extending each of the tetherarms. Because the tethered uni-rotor network vehicle has not initiatedits rotation, there is no centrifugal force to overcome while the tetherarms are being let out.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the satellite vehicle transition fromvertical takeoff to forward flight according to selected embodiments ofthe current disclosure. FIG. 6A shows the satellite vehicle in avertically oriented hover position, where the propulsion units aresupporting the total aerial system weight. FIG. 6B shows the satellitevehicle pitching forward, thereby transitioning into its forward flightconfiguration. The propulsion unit is oriented partially upward suchthat it provides thrust in both an upward and forward direction, whichprovides both lift and horizontal translational movement of thesatellite vehicle. During this transition process, an increasing portionof the system weight is supported by the winged lifting surfaces. FIG.6C shows the satellite vehicle after it has completed the transitionprocess, where it is now operating in its standard forward flight mode.The propulsion unit is oriented horizontally resulting in horizontaltranslational movement of the satellite vehicle, while the wingedlifting surface bears the total weight of the aerial system.

FIG. 7 depicts the tethered uni-rotor network system once the satellitevehicles have completed the transition process. The aerial system is nowoperating with fully extended tethers, rotating at its intended angularrate, and operations for the aerial system are identical to that of thehover flight previously described. The takeoff procedure was explicitlydescribed in previous paragraphs, and the landing procedure follows anidentical process, but carried out in the reverse order.

Embodiments of the current disclosure provide for an aerial system withmultiple tether arms. One arm is not a valid configuration because thereis no means of counter balancing the rotation. Two arms are able tocounter balance one another, but the central hub is free to swing like ahammock. Thus this configuration should only be used as a means ofrecovering a vehicle, should the other tether arms become disabled, oras part of a system that constrains the central hub in other ways, likethe primary tether on an airborne wind energy device. Three arms are theminimum number needed to achieve stability within the central hub, and apreferable number in terms of aerodynamic efficiency, because it has themost concentrated weight to provide the most centrifugal force persatellite. The disadvantage is that, for an odd number of tether arms,horizontal translation is more difficult to control, because pairs oftether arms are not directly opposite one another. Four arms have lessideal centrifugal stiffening than three arms, but it is easier toimplement horizontal translation because pairs of tethers are directlyopposed to one another. Five or more arms are all physically possible,and could be used to add redundancy and robustness to the system as asafety measure, but adding more arms increases complexity andcompromises the amount of centrifugal stiffening.

Each satellite vehicle needs a propulsion unit, which counteractsaerodynamic drag acting on the body, while keeping the tethereduni-rotor network aircraft in a state of rotation. The preferredembodiment uses fixed pitch propellers with brushless electric motorsystems, because of its simplicity. Other means of propulsion units arealso acceptable. Variable pitch propellers could replace or complimentfixed pitch propellers. Various fuel sources; like heavy fuel, fuelcells, or hybrid systems; could replace or compliment an electric powersupply. Or a propeller methodology could be completely omitted, and jetor rocket systems could be elected to provide thrust for each satellitevehicle.

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a satellite vehicle with a gimbal orarticulated propulsion unit according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure. The fuselage 46 includes a gimbal or joint 49 thatsupports the propulsion unit 47, in this embodiment it is a propeller.The propulsion unit 47 moves in various directions and in one or moreaxes 38 relative to the satellite vehicle 40 via the gimbal or joint 49.The various directions of the propulsion unit provides variousdirections of thrust which act on the satellite vehicle 40. Additionaldegrees of freedom within the propulsion unit mechanism may be used toreduce the number of stabilizers, control surfaces, or both.

FIG. 9 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with four propulsion unitsaccording to selected embodiments of the current disclosure. Eachpropulsion unit 47 of the satellite vehicle 40 is above or below thelifting surface 41, and secured to a vertical stabilizer 42. The benefitof this arrangement, is that it resembles a quadrotor type ofconfiguration, which may simplify the controller architecture, and cando away with control surfaces entirely; albeit with a more complicatedstructural design.

FIG. 10 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with a single propulsionunit according to selected embodiments of the current disclosure. Asingle propulsion unit on each satellite system is the minimum numberneeded to overcome aerodynamic drag. As shown in this figure, thepropulsion unit 47 is mounted on a fuselage 46, which is positioned onthe satellite vehicle 40. The location that provides the mostcentrifugal benefit is located on the outboard wingtip, but inboard ormiddle placements are conceivable as well. While a single propulsionunit is sufficient to power the satellite vehicle, this leads tocomplications when implementing the landing system. A single propulsionunit does not provide VTOL capabilities for each individual satellite,so the transition process previously described for takeoff and landingis not possible. Rather, the tether retracting mechanism must operatewhile the aerial system is still rotating, and thus overcome the fullmagnitude of the centrifugal forces pulling on the satellite vehicle,while reeling in the tether arm.

FIG. 11 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with a dual propulsionunits and angled stabilizers according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure. This embodiment uses two propulsion units 47 persatellite 40, one on each end of the wing section 41. By adding a secondpropulsion unit with appropriately placed control surfaces, eachsatellite can takeoff from a tail-sitter configuration, and thentransition a quarter turn into its horizontal or forward flightconfiguration. Because each satellite vehicle has its own VTOLcapability, the system may stop its rotation such that the retractingmechanism does not need to overcome the centrifugal forces. Also, shownin this figure are angled stabilizers and control surfaces 48, whichoperate in a similar fashion to a “ruddervator” of a V-tail aircraft.This may slightly reduce aerodynamic drag, by eliminating a smallstabilizer surface, but it also increases the complexity of thecontroller, because it introduces coupling within the input-outputchannels.

FIG. 12 is a front view of a satellite vehicle with a plurality ofpropulsion units according to selected embodiments of the currentdisclosure. Many propulsion units 47 mounted onto their respectivefuselages 46 are distributed across the leading edge of the wingedlifting surface 41 of the satellite vehicle 40. This configurationapplies forced air over the airfoil which may lead to better laminarflow over the wing surface. However, these additional propulsion unitsrepresent an engineering tradeoff that must be evaluated against anyextra weight and manufacturing complexity.

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a tethered uni-rotor network aircraftwith a satellite vehicle failure according to selected embodiments ofthe current disclosure. This illustration shows a tethered uni-rotornetwork system with a total of four satellite vehicles. Three arefunctional satellite vehicles 40 which are still rotating 22 around thecentral hub 30. The fourth one is a failed satellite vehicle 50, whichis still attached to the central hub 30 via its tether 20. The threeremaining functional satellite vehicles 40 must support the weight ofthe central hub 30 as well as weight of the failed satellite 50. Thedistance between each functional satellite vehicle 40 is adjusted suchthat they maintain an equal distance from one another. For example, theoriginal four functional satellite vehicles would maintain a one-quartercircumference spacing. Upon failure of one of the satellite vehicles 50,the three remaining functional satellite vehicles 40, will readjust tomaintain a one-third circumference spacing.

Embodiments of the current disclosure provide the potential to improveupon wind energy collection stations. As a starting point, consider thedesign of the most common energy kites used for airborne wind energyharvesting. FIG. 14 is a diagram of a prior art airborne wind energydevice. Basically, its a long slender flying wing 33 which is anchoredwith an adjustable tether 24. When it is ready to harvest wind energy,it flies up in the air in a large circle, so that the tether 24 sweeps ahuge cone shape. The tether is connected to a generator that produceselectricity as the tether is pulled out by the wind. Once the tether isat a maximum length, the energy kite comes out of the wind, and thetether 24 reels itself back in. The idea is that there is a net energygain; meaning, the system collects more energy while airborne, than isneeded to reel the system back in at the lower energy state.

A major problem with the current technology, is the amount of dragacting on the tether 24. Because the tether is several kilometers long,it sweeps out a huge cone, all influenced by detrimental parasitic drag.Furthermore, the method of securing most energy kites introduces thesame types of bending moments common within gliders found at the wingroot. Finally, during periods of calm winds, many existing designsutilize a multirotor approach to stay aloft, which is not energyefficient, and thus reduces the total amount of collected energy. Nowconsider an aerial system according to the current disclosure, where thewind energy generator is tethered to the central hub, such that thecentral hub serves as a stationary pivot point that the system mayrotate around. Each of the small individual satellite vehicle tetherswill still feel drag, but the primary major tether, the one thatstretches for several kilometers, can remain stationary without losingenergy to aerodynamic drag.

FIG. 15 is a view of a tethered uni-rotor network system adapted to anairborne wind energy device according to selected embodiments of thecurrent disclosure. The four tethers are much shorter in length than theprimary tether, they have a reduced diameter because they are only sizedfor each satellite vehicle, and inboard sections have little velocityand thus feel very light drag effects. The satellite vehicles 40 rotateabout the central hub 30 via tethers 20. Such a system is contrastedwith a massive tether 24, designed to support the entire kite system 33,using a much larger diameter cable, with a much longer length of severalkilometers, and where portions of it are traveling at the same rate asthe energy kite system. Once again, bending moments on the energy kitecan be mitigated through centrifugal stiffening, and the inefficientmultirotor design to sustain flight during calm periods is replaced witha much more aerodynamically efficient aerial system.

It should be understood that while the preferred embodiments of theinvention are described in some detail herein, the present disclosure ismade by way of example only. Variations and changes thereto are possiblewithout departing from the subject matter coming within the scope of thefollowing claims, and a reasonable equivalency thereof, which claims Iregard as my invention.

All of the material in this patent document is subject to copyrightprotection under the copyright laws of the United States and othercountries. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimilereproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure,as it appears in official governmental records but, otherwise, all othercopyright rights whatsoever are reserved.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of hovering an aerial vehicle comprisingthe process of balancing a weight against a lift, and balancing a thrustagainst a drag, where the weight, the lift, the thrust, and the drag areacting on the aerial vehicle, where the aerial vehicle comprises acentral hub, and two or more tether arms, where each tether armcomprises a tether and a satellite vehicle, where each tether arm issecured to the central hub by its respective tether, where the tether ofeach tether arm is a flexible cable filament that transfers tensileforces, but has an amount of flexibility such that it does not transfercompressive forces or bending moments between the respective satellitevehicle and the central hub, where each satellite vehicle comprises oneor more propulsion units and one or more lifting surfaces, where each ofthe tethers constrain their respective satellite vehicles to orbitaround the central hub, and where centrifugal forces keep each of thetethers taught.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising an actionof producing a satellite thrust on each satellite vehicle to an extentnecessary to overcome an aerodynamic drag.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising an action of producing a satellite lift on eachsatellite vehicle to counteract a satellite the weight of the aerialvehicle.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising an action ofgenerating a rotation within the aerial vehicle arising from aconstrained flight of each satellite vehicle due to its respectivetether.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising an action ofgenerating centrifugal stiffening as a result of the rotation of theaerial vehicle.